WATER. DIGITAL. RESILIENCE

How do we deliver positive social outcomes with flood resiliency in Bangkok?

Written by Ismail Weiliang and Richard Wood, Social Outcomes East Asia Practice Lead, Japan

04 OCT 2022

3 MINS READ


ISMAIL WEILIANG

The Climatebender

RICHARD WOOD

Principal Civil Engineer

Views are entirely ours

and not connected to any company

What are positive social outcomes?

Positive social outcomes simply mean making a positive difference in people’s lives – realising social benefits and responding more holistically to community needs around accessibility, inclusion, empowerment, resilience and wellbeing.

 

Social outcomes are increasingly becoming part of the standard vocabulary in the infrastructure and engineering sectors. This change is being driven by several factors. In many countries, national legislation is considering social impact and inclusion. There is also an increasing demand in the market to deliver socially responsible, inclusive and community-focused projects.

_________________

Quick Take:

  • Social outcomes are increasingly being considered and are becoming standard in national legislation and projects around the world.

  • Social outcomes revolve around community needs of accessibility, inclusion, empowerment, resilience and wellbeing.

Flooding in Bangkok

Bangkok is subject to intense localised rainfall resulting in flooding, traffic disruption, social impacts and economic losses. Flooding typically causes greater health and economic impacts for vulnerable groups, including the elderly and people with disabilities.

 

A Decision Support System (DSS) for Flood Management is being delivered for the city’s authority, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) by Mott MacDonald. It aims to better BMA’s flood response operations, planning and mitigation investments. This is expected to improve resilience and reduce socio-economic damage, especially for the most vulnerable.

_________________

Quick Take:

  • Flooding typically causes greater health and economic impacts for vulnerable groups.

GESI Mainstreaming, Proactive Community Inclusion and SDG goals

GESI (Gender Equality and Social Inclusion) was key in the programme delivery. Vulnerable groups including women, children, the elderly, migrants, the urban poor and people with disabilities were considered in studies on flood impact, preparedness and response, policy mechanisms and flood warning systems. Baseline assessments and GESI capacity building activities for city authorities were also conducted. Recommendations were then provided to address GESI considerations within flood risk mitigation options appraisal and flood warning systems. This provided practical examples of GESI mainstreaming in flood risk management.​

Proactive community inclusion was done with local communities to understand their challenges and provide mitigation recommendations. A local GESI expert was engaged and completed a series of ‘roundtable’ discussions with community NGOs representing all main GESI Groups and government departments to exchange knowledge and seek improved inter-agency collaboration.

The project scope was aligned to SDG goals with an assessment process and review workshops to continuously improve performance for stakeholders. Visualisation tools are a great way to communicate and understand SDG alignment. This promotes project understanding, stakeholder participation and team building - maximising potential for the project. Of particular importance is having clear and simple Performance Criteria selected for the SDG assessment process.​

_________________

Quick Take:

  • Mainstreaming GESI (Gender Equality and Social Inclusion) was key in including vulnerable groups in the programme delivery.

  • Proactive community inclusion by local GESI experts with community NGOs representing all GESI Groups and government departments will help embed inclusivity in decision making.

  • Clear and simple performance criteria for the assessment process and visualisation tools for SDG goals is important in maximising potentials for stakeholders.

Delivering Positive Social Outcomes

The engagement showed that the community had two main needs:​ 1) Practical needs that directly affect people’s wellbeing, such as measures to minimise economic impact, improved healthcare and access to emergency assistance during flooding.​ 2) Strategic needs such as resilience and ability to mitigate impacts, including flood preparedness and response planning for each vulnerable group, enhanced community engagement and increased collaboration between stakeholders.​ The consultation also highlighted flood-related health problems, a lack of access to healthcare, sanitation and emergency assistance,  and significant economic impacts on local businesses, such as difficulties in commuting due to flooding. ​

_________________

Quick Take:

  • Recommendations in delivering positive social outcomes for flood resilience include 1) Increased collaboration between agencies involved in flood management, 2) ​Proactive flood emergency response and community self-resilience capacity building.

Authors:

Richard Wood is a Chartered Civil Engineer with 20 years’ experience in the design, construction and project management of major water and wastewater infrastructure projects, including significant tunnelling experience.  Currently a Principal Civil Engineer in Mott MacDonald’s Japan office and he has spent over two years in Thailand as part of the on-site project management team for a major water treatment and supply project.  

Ismail Weiliang is a climate resilience consultant with over half a decade of experience and specialises in flood risk advisory for Asia. His work involves advising governments and development banks on strategies to transform climate risks into resilience. He also founded “The Climatebender” a non-profit organisation that provides humanitarian relief to communities vulnerable to the climate crisis.

©2021 The Climatebender